[LLVMdev] Typo in IsLegalToCallImmediateAddr?
Eric Christopher
echristo at apple.com
Fri Oct 21 16:05:28 PDT 2011
IIRC the kernel uses relocation model as static.
-eric
On Oct 21, 2011, at 3:57 PM, David Meyer wrote:
> Eli,
>
> Hm. There's a test in (CodeGen/X86/call-imm.ll) which uses darwin with
> relocation model static. It expects to use call-to-immediate.
>
> Is this in error? Should I disable this check?
>
> - pdox
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/10/21 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>:
>>>> Could be, echristo, bigcheese, would this be correct for Mach-O and COFF?
>>>
>>> bigcheese noted on IRC that the test crashes the COFF emitter. For some
>>> reason I am always getting
>>>
>>> movl $256, %eax ## imm = 0x100
>>> calll *%eax
>>>
>>> on darwin already
>>
>> IIRC, we never use Static on Darwin targets.
>>
>> -Eli
>>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list