[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer

[Anshuman Dasgupta]

>  Maybe we could have a BoF session during the conference on the 18^th 
of November
>  to come up with a basic set of release criteria for ARM targets?


I had submitted a BoF proposal to discuss correctness testing and 
performance tracking processes for LLVM. While the agenda for the BoF is 
more general than just ARM, we could discuss the release criteria for 
ARM targets as part of that BoF.


Thanks
-Anshu



*From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] 
*On Behalf Of *Kristof Beyls
*Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2011 6:31 AM
*To:* 'Tanya Lattner'; rajav at codeaurora.org
*Cc:* James Molloy; 'Joe Abbey'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
*Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer

I agree with the remarks made by Tanya.

Our team plans to actively help fix release blocker bugs for ARM targets.

However, clear release criteria need to be defined for that, so that 
it's clear which bugs are release blockers. Additionally, continuous 
testing needs to be set up to automatically determine whether there are 
any release blocker bugs or not.

Maybe we could have a BoF session during the conference on the 18^th of 
November to come up with a basic set of release criteria for ARM targets?

Thanks,

Kristof

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111017/8d119671/attachment.html>