[LLVMdev] Order of Basic Blocks

[Ryan Taylor]

Sorry, forgot to add group to CC.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Cameron,
>
>   To make it less vague, I would ideally like to traverse top down. I
> believe what you suggested is what I want, I will have a look at it.
>
>   Currently, I am iterating over the BBs in a Function, so
> Function::iterator BBitr=F->begin(), BBitrE=F->end();
> BBitr!=BBitrE;++BBitr, does that help clarify what I'm looking for? With
> this current iteration method, I seem to sometimes get top down but other
> times get bottom up and sometimes it starts top down then jumps to the
> bottom and goes bottom up. Is there a reason for this randomness?
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at apple.com>wrote:
>
>> Your question is a bit vague, but you probably want
>> ReversePostOrderTraversal from include/llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h.
>>
>> Cameron
>>
>> On Nov 20, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Ryan Taylor wrote:
>>
>> > LLVMers,
>> >
>> >   Is there any way to guarantee iteration of the basic blocks from top
>> down or path to path? Currently it looks sort of semi-random, sometimes
>> visiting loop heads first and other times loop tails, is there a way I can
>> visit the BBs top down or path to path?
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > LLVM Developers mailing list
>> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111120/ce02f553/attachment.html>