[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM
Sergei Larin
slarin at codeaurora.org
Tue Nov 1 14:36:24 PDT 2011
Sorry if it sounded like I have questioned the need for these tests - rather
I am trying to gather as much info up-front as I can.
Maybe that's why some sort of FAQ for backend submission (as Tony pointed)
is not such a bad idea :)
Thanks everyone for quick responses. Point is taken.
Sergei Larin
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 2:22 PM
To: Sergei Larin
Cc: 'Eli Friedman'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM
On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Sergei Larin wrote:
> Eli,
>
> We can probably think of something like that, but diff on assembly output
> is prone to false negatives and depends on the machine independent part of
> the compiler...
Please look at how all of the existing tests in test/CodeGen/<Target> work
before rejecting the suggestion.
-eric
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list