[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM

Tony Linthicum tlinth at codeaurora.org
Tue Nov 1 12:32:16 PDT 2011


Thanks, Eric and Eli.  We will do that, and will add some tests to 
include with our submission.

We are also in the process of getting our simulator and C library (both 
proprietary) released under a new license so that folks can download 
them and actually run programs.  That's a couple of months away, though, 
and doesn't really help much for creating LLVM regression tests.  Still, 
it will make reproducing problems easier. :)

Tony


On 11/1/2011 2:22 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Sergei Larin wrote:
>
>> Eli,
>>
>>   We can probably think of something like that, but diff on assembly output
>> is prone to false negatives and depends on the machine independent part of
>> the compiler...
>
> Please look at how all of the existing tests in test/CodeGen/<Target>  work
> before rejecting the suggestion.
>
> -eric
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list