[LLVMdev] GSoC: PTX Back-End for LLVM

[Justin Holewinski]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Tobias Grosser
<grosser at fim.uni-passau.de>wrote:

> On 03/28/2011 09:12 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am going to submit a GSoC proposal for LLVM this year, and I would
>> like to first post it here to get constructive feedback before I submit
>> it before the April 8 deadline.  This is the first time I have submitted
>> a GSoC proposal, so please be brutal with the feedback. :)
>>
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> I think this is a great idea. I am highly interested in PTX code
> generation.
>
> [...Proposal...]
>
> The proposal is nice and shows that you already have a good idea of your
> project.
>
> Here some ideas how you can further improve it:
>
> 1. Milestones / Time line
>
> You already have a two-phase development plan. I believe it would be nice,
> if you can further split it into a set of smaller milestones. Each could
> include a short description of what you plan to deliver, how long its
> implementation will take and when you plan to implement it during the summer
> of code. Those milestones could be sorted into the time frame you have for
> the GSoC. In addition, you could define "Success Criteria" for the
> midterm/final evaluation.
>
> This will make it easy to see during GSoC, if you are on track with your
> project and will allow you and your mentor to readjust your milestones if
> necessary.
>
> When developing mile stones and success criteria, better be conservative
> and only add items you are confident you can implement during GSoC. You can
> add additionally a set of "if time permits" milestones, where you put the
> stuff that is not 100% needed, but that would be good to have.
>
> 2. It would be nice to include a description of the examples you have
> already tested
>
> 3. Define the exceptions
>
> It would be good to know what parts you definitely do not plan to implement
> and best why not (Postponed, impossible, not relevant, ...).
> Like this people can understand to what extend your backend will be usable
> after the GSoC.
>
> 4. Phase two is currently a little short
>
> What kind of optimizations do you plan? Have you already an idea or will
> you investigate this when you get to this point? How much time do you plan
> to spend on Part II? If it is more than two weeks, it would be good to
> elaborate a little on what you plan to do there exactly.
>
>
> So that's all for the moment. As the application was already nice, I just
> did some conceptually nitpicking. ;-)
>

Thanks for the comments!

I have updated the proposal; it can be found at:
https://sites.google.com/site/justinholewinski/projects/gsoc/llvm-ptx-back-end-2011

Please let me know if you have any comments before I submit it to Melange in
the next few days!



>
> Cheers
> Tobi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Thanks,

Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110331/c03ba10a/attachment.html>