[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

[Sohail Somani]

On 11-06-12 4:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Sohail,
> 
>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
> 
> not currently.  The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke
> instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks.  See
> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt
> for a discussion.
> 
> Ciao, Duncan.

Thanks Duncan, I've continued the discussion regarding the same changes
on an earlier thread (in response to Rafael) and would love your input
there!