[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status
Jack Howarth
howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu
Thu Jun 9 06:18:46 PDT 2011
Duncan,
Below are the tabulated compile times and executable sizes.
A) gcc 4.5.4svn using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
B) gcc 4.5.4svn/dragonegg using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns
C) gcc 4.5.4svn/dragonegg using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
Compile time (seconds)
Benchmark A) stock B) gcc 4.5.4/ C) gcc 4.5.4/
gcc 4.5.4 dragonegg/optzns dragonegg
ac 0.61 1.65 0.32
aermod 31.24 25.83 21.02
air 1.74 1.49 0.81
capacita 0.83 0.80 0.44
channel 0.34 0.33 0.25
doduc 3.09 2.63 1.63
fatigue 1.04 1.08 0.84
gas_dyn 0.91 0.95 0.75
induct 3.18 2.57 1.73
linpk 0.34 0.30 0.21
mdbx 1.08 1.01 0.59
nf 0.39 0.41 0.28
protein 1.55 1.29 0.97
rnflow 1.76 1.73 1.26
test_fpu 1.38 1.40 1.05
tfft 0.31 0.28 0.19
mean 3.11 2.73 2.02
Executable size (bytes)
Benchmark A) stock B) gcc 4.5.4/ C) gcc 4.5.4/
gcc 4.5.4 dragonegg/optzns dragonegg
ac 26344 30896 26704
aermod 1145924 1043816 1052056
air 57404 57700 53532
capacita 40864 41008 37064
channel 22448 22664 22664
doduc 127340 124108 120124
fatigue 61152 65352 65664
gas_dyn 647864 58768 !!! 59024
induct 162360 180440 175312
linpk 18112 18848 18864
mdbx 53464 57652 49516
nf 22560 23784 24080
protein 74320 74440 74816
rnflow 66040 71488 71648
test_fpu 52624 58224 58320
tfft 18416 18456 18600
The compile times with optzns are 26% slower than stock dragonegg
but 12% faster than stock gcc 4.5.4. The most interesting executable
size difference is gas_dyn which fastest with optzns but 11x larger
in size with stock gcc 4.5.4 compared to either stock dragonegg or
dragonegg with optzns. This is likely much improved in gcc 4.6 with
the new -fwhole-file default.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:51:51AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack, thanks for these numbers. Can you also please measure compile times?
> I'm thinking of enabling gcc optimizations by default, but I don't want to
> increase compile times, which means choosing a value for the
> -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize option that is low enough to get good
> compile times, yet high enough to get fast code. It would be great if you could
> play around with this to find a good choice.
>
> Best wishes, Duncan.
>
> > Current dragonegg svn has all of the -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns bugs for
> > usage with -ffast-math -O3 addressed except for those related to PR2314. Using the -fno-tree-vectorize
> > option, we can evaluate the current state of -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns with
> > the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compared to stock dragonegg and stock gcc 4.5.4. The runtime
> > benchmarks below show that we average slightly faster than stock gcc 4.5.4 and significantly
> > faster than stock dragonegg through the use of -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns.
> >
> > x86_64 darwin
> >
> > A) gcc 4.5.4svn using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
> > B) gcc 4.5.4svn/dragonegg using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns
> > C) gcc 4.5.4svn/dragonegg using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
> >
> >
> > Benchmark A) stock B) gcc 4.5.4/ C) gcc 4.5.4/
> > gcc 4.5.4 dragonegg/optzns dragonegg
> >
> > ac 9.58 9.13 12.30
> > aermod 20.88 16.10 17.62
> > air 6.16 6.59 7.70
> > capacita 35.68 39.94 46.22
> > channel 2.03 2.04 1.96
> > doduc 28.28 28.43 30.41
> > fatigue 8.13 7.19 10.40
> > gas_dyn 10.10 9.83 11.73
> > induct 20.17 20.76 48.76
> > linpk 15.42 15.65 15.69
> > mdbx 11.42 11.73 12.07
> > nf 27.99 28.60 29.39
> > protein 38.36 39.08 39.98
> > rnflow 27.28 28.19 31.90
> > test_fpu 11.43 11.17 11.50
> > tfft 1.91 1.95 2.16
> >
> > Mean 12.72 12.62 14.71
> >
> > Once vector_select() is implemented we can retest without -fno-tree-vectorize.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list