[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM

[Reid Kleckner]

He wants to be able to resume execution from the debugger after
assertion failure.

Reid

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alistair Lynn <arplynn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi-
>
>> Yep, but tripping the debugger is highly non-portable.
>
> You're suggesting that inline asm is more portable than calling abort?
>
> Alistair
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>