[LLVMdev] Fw: RTTI gone in 3.0?

[Michael Ilseman]

The LLVM Coding Standards[1] document advices to never use them. This
was not the case for the 2.8 docs, but is for the 2.9 and the current
one. As far as whether it's never used in the source code base, I
don't know.

[1] http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ci_rtti_exceptions

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Forgot to CC the list, sorry.
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>
>> To: FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI gone in 3.0?
>>
>> Hi FlyLanguage,
>>
>> I thought LLVM disabled RTTI a long time ago.  It was just too slow.
>>
>> --Sam
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com>
>>>  To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>>>  Cc:
>>>  Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 5:09 AM
>>>  Subject: [LLVMdev] RTTI gone in 3.0?
>>>
>>>  Just wondering if rtti will be gone in 3.0? I'd like to port llvm to my
>>
>>>  OS, where the gcc runtime env has rtti turned off.
>>>
>>>  Thanks.
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>  LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu        http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>