[LLVMdev] why dummy asserting base/interface class virtual methods instead of pure virtual methods?
Heikki Kultala
hkultala at cs.tut.fi
Thu Jan 20 23:11:22 PST 2011
LLVM code base seems to be full of base/interface classes, which have
methods like
virtual SDValue
LowerCall(SDValue Chain, SDValue Callee,
CallingConv::ID CallConv, bool isVarArg, bool &isTailCall,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::OutputArg> &Outs,
const SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &OutVals,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::InputArg> &Ins,
DebugLoc dl, SelectionDAG &DAG,
SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &InVals) const {
assert(0 && "Not Implemented");
return SDValue(); // this is here to silence compiler errors
}
Why are these not pure virtual methods?
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list