[LLVMdev] TableGen Operator Names
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Tue Jan 11 17:39:22 PST 2011
On Jan 11, 2011, at 12:27 PM, David A. Greene wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>
>>> Would anyone object if I changed the syntax from !operator to &operator?
>>
>> In the absence of a much better proposal, I'd prefer to just keep it the way it is.
>
> Fair enough. What would make a better proposal? I'd like to keep the
> syntax concise. I wonder if there is a way we could get rid of the
> "operator" entirely and just specify names, like:
>
> strconcat("this", "that")
>
> instead of
>
> !strconcat("this", "that")
>
> What do you think?
That would be nice. I haven't looked in years, but I thought that there was a parser ambiguity issue.
-Chris
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list