[LLVMdev] Increasing TargetRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister?

[Chris Lattner]

On Jan 7, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Clinton wrote:

> On 01/07/2011 02:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> 
>> Unless your goal is to merge this work onto LLVM mainline, the best thing to do is a local hack in your tree.
>> 
>> -Chris
> 
> Yes, I will create a patch for my tree to increase 
> FirstVirtualRegister.  Would this be a good change to include in 2.9?

I think it makes the most sense to discuss that when you're interested in merging the dependent work onto mainline.  Dales's idea of using positive/negative numbers makes sense to me.

-Chris