[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
Óscar Fuentes
ofv at wanadoo.es
Wed Jan 5 11:04:41 PST 2011
Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
> And this is why I don't understand configure checks for windows... There's
> only one/two header/library sets... The Windows SDK and MinGW. This info
> should be built in IMHO...
Although the panorama is not so diverse as the Unix world, there is
quite a bit of variation on Windows too. Apart from the
cygwin/mingw/vc++ distinction, there are multiple versions of their
respective C libraries, intrinsics and language features supported by
the compilers, etc. Plus some people may want to use third party
libraries for certain things.
Note: the platform tests makes no difference among the official Windows
SDK libraries and MinGW's Winapi. Maybe you are thinking on the MS C
runtime (that evolves with every VC++ compiler release) and the MinGW C
runtime (which wraps some version of the MS C runtime and adds stuff of
its own.)
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list