[LLVMdev] DIFactory

[Talin]

I didn't know DIFactory existed until you mentioned it just now.

And if folks are adding brand new classes to LLVM, can we not follow the
naming conventions in the developer guidelines?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote:

> Seems the last use of DIFactory in LLVM/Clang is in:
>
> clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp to get the enums
> llvm::DIFactory::OpDeref and llvm::DIFactory::OpPlus.
>
> Shouldn't this be moved to DIBuilder and remove the dependency completely?
>
> --
> cheers,
> --renato
>
> http://systemcall.org/
>
> Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>



-- 
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110218/de201df6/attachment.html>