[LLVMdev] Disassembly arbitrary machine-code byte arrays

Tom Prince tom.prince at ualberta.net
Tue Dec 20 08:25:28 PST 2011

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:24:27 +1100, Aidan Steele <llvm at aidans.org> wrote:
> A follow-up question: is the C interface to LLVM a second-class
> citizen or should I reasonably be able to expect to do everything with
> it that I could do as a consumer of the C++ API?

The other thing to note about the C api, is that things are added to it
mostly on an as needed basis. So if something is missing, you can ask it
got it added, which I guess should happen, unless it might be difficult
so support long term (i.e. it exposes something unstable).


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list