[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
Kostya Serebryany
kcc at google.com
Tue Dec 27 13:39:04 PST 2011
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What would be the best fix for asan?
> > Force -mdisable-fp-elim when asan is enabled or document that asan
> > requires -fomit-frame-pointer for better warning messages?
>
> Just messages?
Yes.
Asan unwinds stack on every malloc/free and on failure.
w/o frame pointers the warning message will be less useful, but the ability
to find bugs will not be affected.
> I would suggest documentation.
>
Ok, I'll do that later (if no one else has an opposite opinion).
--kcc
>
> If it is needed by some of the checks then enabling frame pointers by
> default when asan is enabled and rejecting or warning when someone tries
> to use both asan and -fomit-frame-pointer is probably better.
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --kcc
> >
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111227/9ab67e02/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list