[LLVMdev] Changes to Debian's linker object files breaks building LLVM [crti.o, crt1.o, crtn.o]

Marc J. Driftmeyer mjd at reanimality.com
Thu Aug 25 17:58:51 PDT 2011


Debian's response I enclose to see if this helps out:

> reassign 639214 general
> forcemerge 637232 639214
> quit
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
>
>> With the most recent changes of moving the object files under
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/  the linker to build Clang/LLVM breaks.
>>
>> A workaround is to add symlinks for crt1.o, crti.o and crtn.o back
>> under /usr/lib.
>  From /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian.gz:
>
>    Starting with the eglibc package version 2.13-5, the libraries are
>    shipped in the multiarch directory/lib/$arch instead of the more
>    traditional /lib. Similarly the includes are now shipped in
>    /usr/include/$arch instead of the more traditional /usr/include.
>
>    The toolchain in Debian has been updated to cope with that, and most
>    build systems should be unaffected. If you are using a non-Debian
>    toolchain to build your software and it is not able to cope with
>    multiarch, you might try to pass the following option to your
>    compiler:
>
>      -B/usr/lib/$arch -I/usr/include/$arch
>
> Does clang support similar options?
>
> See alsohttp://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6541  which suggests to
> me that upstream is interested in out-of-the-box support for the new
> paths.
>
> Reassigning to "general" and merging with the relevant bug, since this
> is far from a libc-specific problem.  See [1] for some background.
>
> Thanks and hope that helps,
> Jonathan
>
> [1]http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch

- Marc



On 08/24/2011 06:36 PM, Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> I've got a simple workaround which obviously everyone will figure out:
>
> mdriftmeyer at horus:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s x86_64-linux-gnu/crti.o crti.o
> mdriftmeyer at horus:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o crt1.o
> mdriftmeyer at horus:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s x86_64-linux-gnu/crtn.o crtn.o
>
> My real question concerns whether or not I should file a bug report 
> against Debian not having a transition path or other means in Debian's 
> update-alternatives infrastructure to update those paths and make them 
> available system-wide or whether LLVM needs to be aware of this move 
> and update autotools configurations files for make to traverse.
>
> - Sincerely,
>
> Marc
>
> -- 
> Marc J. Driftmeyer
> Email :: mjd at reanimality.com <mailto:mjd at reanimality.com>
> Web :: http://www.reanimality.com
> Cell :: (509) 435-5212
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-- 
Marc J. Driftmeyer
Email :: mjd at reanimality.com <mailto:mjd at reanimality.com>
Web :: http://www.reanimality.com
Cell :: (509) 435-5212
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110825/ffb83d42/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mjd.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 317 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110825/ffb83d42/attachment.vcf>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list