[LLVMdev] GSOC Adaptive Compilation Framework for LLVM JIT Compiler
Owen Anderson
resistor at mac.com
Mon Apr 4 10:49:53 PDT 2011
On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> <snip conversation about call patching>
It seems to me that there's a general feature here that LLVM is lacking, that would be useful in a number of JIT-compilation contexts, namely the ability to mark certain instructions (direct calls, perhaps branches too) as back-patchable.
The thing that stands out to me is that back-patching a call or branch in a JIT'd program is very much like relocation resolution that a dynamic linker does at launch time for a statically compiled program. It seems like it might be possible to build on top of the runtime-dyld work that Jim has been doing for the MC-JIT to facilitate this. Here's the idea:
Suppose we had a means of tagging certain calls (and maybe branches) as explicitly requiring relocations. Any back-patchable call would have a relocation in the generated code, and the MC-JIT would be aware of the location and type of the relocations, and rt-dyld would handle the upfront resolution. Backpatching, then, is just a matter of updating the resolution for a given symbol, and asking rt-dyld to re-link the executable code.
Thoughts?
--Owen
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list