[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support
Nathan Jeffords
blunted2night at gmail.com
Mon Sep 27 10:25:33 PDT 2010
thanks
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Nathan Jeffords
> <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Nathan Jeffords
> >> <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi guys,
> >> > While trying to get dwarf debugging information to work with Win32
> COFF
> >> > targets, I came across a couple of issues with the current
> >> > implementation
> >> > of WinCOFFObjectWriter. Emitting empty section causes debug
> information
> >> > to
> >> > invalid, as the presence of certain debug section implies available
> >> > information, and emission of labels as symbols confused gdb about the
> >> > structure of the program.
> >> > The attached patch allows the WinCOFFObjectWriter to drop empty
> >> > sections,
> >> > and label symbols. It converts relocations targeted at symbols into
> >> > relocations relative to the containing section.
> >> > I have not run the tests in the '/test/MC/COFF', but have run through
> >> > the
> >> > unit-test framework for my compiler and generated some text
> executables
> >> > with
> >> > clang and everything looks to be in order. It may change the output of
> >> > the '/test/MC/COFF' if the string references are emitted as
> >> > temporaries.
> >> > -Nathan
> >>
> >> The patch looks good, but please follow the LLVM coding conventions.
> >> Also, clang emits warnings on all of the signed-unsigned comparisons,
> >> and the order of initialization for COFFSymbol::MCData.
> >>
> >> The test fails, but that's only because it is looking for binary
> >> equivalence, just llc the test and run coff-dump to re update it. I
> >> ran the test-suite with clang -integrated-as with and without your
> >> patch and I got identical results.
> >>
> >> So fix the coding conventions, warnings, and update the tests and it's
> >> good. I don't mind doing this if you would prefer.
> >>
> >> - Michael Spencer
> >
> > If you don't mind then please make the appropriate changes. Thanks.
> > -Nathan
>
> Committed in r114823.
>
> - Michael Spencer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100927/e2b6b669/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list