[LLVMdev] NEON intrinsics

[Bob Wilson]

On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Renato Golin wrote:

> On 21 September 2010 21:16, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
>> It's referring to the arm.neon.vabds intrinsic, which is different than the old vabal intrinsic.
> 
> Ok, sorry, those were the ones I was referring to: @llvm.arm.neon.* intrinsics.
> 
> Is it polluting too much to add the few last (llvm.arm.neon.vadd,
> llvm.arm.neon.vsub)? It makes it a bit easier to generate neon
> instructions in the front-end if everything is an LLVM intrinsic...

No, please don't add any more NEON intrinsics.