[LLVMdev] Query on llvm-gcc v/s llc/as
Samuel Crow
samuraileumas at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 17 11:34:31 PDT 2010
Hi Raghu,
I think the difference lies in the fact that llc has 4 as its maximum
optimization level to allow link-time optimization. If this is what you're
noticing, then the second should be modified to "llc -O4 test.bc -o test.s". I
could be wrong though.
--Sam
----- Original Message ----
> From: Raghu Prabhakar <raghu at cs.ucla.edu>
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Fri, September 17, 2010 1:10:54 PM
> Subject: [LLVMdev] Query on llvm-gcc v/s llc/as
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have started using LLVM recently, and I have a basic question. There are two
>different ways in which an executable can be generated from a .c file - by just
>using llvm-gcc, and using a combination of llvm-gcc (to emit bitcode .bc), llc
>(to emit assembly code), as (to assemble the code) and collect2 (linker). For
>example, consider compiling test.c :
>
> 1) llvm-gcc -O3 test.c -o testExecutable
>
> 2) llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm -c test.c -o test.bc
> llc -O3 test.bc -o test.s
> as test.s -o test.o
> gcc test.o -o testExecutable2
>
> My question is, are the two executables (testExecutable and testExecutable2)
>basically the same ? Is there any huge difference between the two processes
>which will impact the executable's running time ? I am asking this because I
>compared the executables by their wordcounts (wc -c), and there was a slight
>difference. However, when I timed the test runs, both performances were
>identical.
>
> Kindly help me out on this.
>
> Thanks.
> Raghu.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list