[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 7, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Generating IR code without the benefit of unions, makes both
> me generating and generated code far less readable. I'm going
> to have to stick with version 2.7 and work on getting unions
> back in 2.9.

Great!  I'm sure many people would really appreciate working union support in 2.9, thanks!

-Chris