[LLVMdev] Missed devirtualization opportunities

[Mahadevan R]

Hi Kenneth,

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> At this point I'm looking for suggestions and feedback.  I think
> implementing (1) and (2) would go a long way toward making several
> other transformations safely more aggressive, but would involve
> noticeable (unacceptable?) overhead.  Does what I'm looking for
> already exist?  Have they already been considered and rejected due to
> the overhead involved?

Have you considered something like this [1]?

[1] http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn/articles/cpp-opt.pdf

Cheers,
-Mahadevan.