[LLVMdev] [Q] x86 peephole deficiency
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Thu Oct 7 10:50:23 PDT 2010
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Gabor Greif wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am slowly working on a SwitchInst optimizer (http://llvm.org/PR8125)
> and now I am running into a deficiency of the x86
> peephole optimizer (or jump-threader?). Here is what I get:
>
>
> andl $3, %edi
> je .LBB0_4
> # BB#2: # %nz
> # in Loop: Header=BB0_1
> Depth=1
> cmpl $2, %edi
> je .LBB0_6
> # BB#3: # %nz.non-middle
> # in Loop: Header=BB0_1
> Depth=1
> cmpl $2, %edi
> jbe .LBB0_4
> # BB#5: # %sw.bb6
> ret
>
> the second 'cmpl' is totally redundant, which pass is
> (or would be) in charge of removing it?
MachineCSE should be in charge of zapping it.
-Chris
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list