[LLVMdev] Ahoy JIT Users

[Daniel Dunbar]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Wesley Peck <peckw at wesleypeck.com> wrote:
> Will this poking include converting the JIT to use the MC framework?

That is the motivation for me poking at things, yes.

> I've added an MC based asm parser, disassembler, and code emitter recently to the MBlaze backend and it would be nice to get JIT support automatically :)

I agree, that would be an excellent proof of the benefits of the
unified architecture!

 - Daniel

> -- Wesley Peck
>
> On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:42 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am starting to poke at the LLVM JIT, which seems to be in need of some TLC.
>>
>> If you are a "sophisticated" JIT user and are using either internal
>> APIs (either by integrating with LLVM, or by other C++ tricks), or are
>> using obscure or poorly documented public APIs (e.g., why is
>> runJITOnFunction exposed?) please make me aware of it!
>>
>> I reserve the right to break anything which doesn't have a unit test
>> in the tree. :)
>>
>> I will try very hard to not break anything which *does* have an
>> existing public interface.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>