[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r104737 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp

[Alistair Lynn]

Hello-

Shouldn't this catch swapcontext as well?

Alistair

On 26 May 2010, at 22:14, Dale Johannesen wrote:

> 
> On May 26, 2010, at 2:05 PMPDT, Dan Gohman wrote:
> 
>> vfork and getcontext have wildly platform-dependent semantics.  
>> Handling
>> them conservatively is reasonable, even if some platforms don't need  
>> it.
>> 
>> Dan
> 
> Agreed.  Also, the performance of  code in the area of a vfork call is  
> not going to be critical.
> 
>> On May 26, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>> 
>>> Definitely not vfork. That's unnecessary. gcc is mistaken, we  
>>> shouldn't follow it. Also, getcontext is such a generic name. It's  
>>> a really bad idea to look for it.
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits