[LLVMdev] Union types

[Renato Golin]

On 29 March 2010 13:52, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> Given its overall status I think it even might be dropped somewhere near 2.8

Really? I saw some progress on UnionTypes this year (Tim, Talin), is
there any reason to drop support for it?

Given that the current alternative route (dynamic struct types,
memcpy, static initialization for local variables) is horrible, is
there any plans on making the support for unions less painful?

cheers,
--renato