[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] bugzilla change
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Mon Mar 8 13:26:22 PST 2010
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Nice!
>
> Can we get rid of the unnecessarily refined categories? From my
> perspective, we rarely use the large list of components and products
> that we have, and they just complicate things for users.
>
> For Clang, for example, I think we could get away with
> {Sema,C++,Codegen,[C++0x],Documentation} without any loss of
> functionality.
Yes, I plan to clean up the llvm components as well, adding a top level code generation component etc.
If you tell me how you want the clang components, I'm happy to fix them.
-Chris
>
> - Daniel
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> FYI, I changed bugzilla to simplify it a bit. I removed all of the different priority levels (P1-5) so that we now just have one priority (I couldn't figure out how to remove the field) and simplified the severity field to only include "enhancement" "normal" and "release blocker".
>>
>> There was some confusion about why bugs were "just a p5" etc, hopefully that is defined away now.
>>
>> -Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list