[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
Anton Korobeynikov
anton at korobeynikov.info
Tue Jul 20 01:36:19 PDT 2010
> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type in
> LLVM?
I think in its current state the unions should be removed from LLVM IR
in next release. It's pretty much unfinished and noone is willing to
work on them.
> Is there a front-end emitting union type?
Not that I'm aware of.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list