[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison

[Eli Friedman]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:54 AM, John Regehr <regehr at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've posted an updated code size comparison between LLVM, GCC, and
> others here:
>
>   http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/
>
> New in this version:
>
> - much larger collection of harvested functions: more than 360,000
>
> - bug fixes and UI improvements
>
> - added the x86 Open64 compiler

I started looking through the llvm-gcc vs. clang comparisons, and
noticed that in
http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/jan_10/harvest/source/A9/A9AB5AE7.c
, size_t is declared incorrectly.  Any idea how that might have
happened?

-Eli