[LLVMdev] Two suggestions for improving LLVM error reporting
Jon Harrop
jon at ffconsultancy.com
Sat Jan 9 00:07:09 PST 2010
On Saturday 09 January 2010 06:11:03 Chris Lattner wrote:
> My eventual goal (perhaps for LLVM 3.0) is to eliminate our current
> structural type system altogether. The benefits are blown away by the
> costs, eventually we should just fix this design mistake. In the meantime,
> I'm not opposed to adding a Module* to VMCore that type dumping defaults to
> if non-null.
Can you elaborate on this? I'm loving LLVM's structural types and they're
making my work a lot easier.
Having to come up with names for all of the structural types in my language
just to satisfy LLVM's new type system would suck...
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list