[LLVMdev] Possibly using a broken version of GCC to build LLVM (file won't finish compiling).
Shantonu Sen
ssen at apple.com
Sun Feb 21 17:45:02 PST 2010
Should the "broken compilers" page start recommending that you build llvm+clang unoptimized, and then use clang/clang++ to build what you want optimized as the final product (once this is fully supported)? Should the top-level Makefile support a bootstrap target of this nature if you have clang checkout?
Shantonu
Sent from my MacBook
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Puyan Lotfi wrote:
>> From a cached version of the Getting Started Guide, I have found:
>
> "GCC 3.4.4 (CodeSourcery ARM 2005q3-2): this compiler miscompiles LLVM
> when building with optimizations enabled. It appears to work with
> "make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION=-O1" or build a debug build."
>
> I'm trying that now.
>
> -Puyan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajika at wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>> Puyan,
>> There is a doc on the document page which describe the list of broken GCCs. You'll need to check it once the docs are online.
>>
>> Rajika
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Puyan Lotfi <puyan at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Does there exist a list of relative compile times for source files in LLVM?
>>> I am doing a build for ARM on an actual ARM device, and CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp is taking a really long time to compile (it's been like 20 minutes or more).
>>> I don't even get an error. All the files before it compile pretty quickly but this file in particular just won't finish.
>>>
>>> The version of gcc I have on my Nokia N800 (that I got from the Maemo SDK repository) is:
>>>
>>> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (release) (CodeSourcery ARM 2005q3-2)
>>>
>>> I'm kind of worried it may be a broken version as far as compiling for LLVM goes, but a lot of the docs and things on the LLVM website seem to be down this weekend.
>>>
>>> Anyways, if anyone has similar experience let me know. I dug around for some past mails on this list regarding building LLVM for this device, and all I found was something from LLVM-2.2 days.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Puyan
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://rajikak.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> --
> Puyan
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list