On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > >> 3. Are there any llvm functionality that you need exposed to ocaml? > > Nope. The only feature I'd like is exceptions on the OCaml side from LLVM > errors. What errors? We won't be able to catch asserts, but perhaps there are other errors we could detect?