[LLVMdev] Metadata [volatile bug?]
David Greene
dag at cray.com
Thu Feb 11 15:15:48 PST 2010
On Thursday 11 February 2010 14:44:23 Dan Gohman wrote:
> > Then we can't use it to hold a non-temporal flag. The operand might be
> > non-temporal in one context but it may not be in another.
>
> Sharing only happens when two instructions have the "same" memory
> reference info. You just need to make sure that the non-temporal
> flag is significant. It's not fundamentally different from the
> volatile flag in this respect.
Ok, this sounds right, but this look wrong:
/// Abstact virtual class for operations for memory operations
class MemSDNode : public SDNode {
[...]
bool isVolatile() const { return (SubclassData >> 5) & 1; }
Shouldn't that be MMO->isVolatile()?
-Dave
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list