[LLVMdev] Exception Table Padding Change

[Bill Wendling]

On Feb 5, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Garrison Venn wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> Just to verify that I understand correctly, the proposal should not have any affect on pre-existing code since we
> already call readULEB128(...) for the call-site table length. High bit set for 3 bytes results in 4 byte read as per
> uleb128. This is obvious now that I've taken time to write this, but hey if nothing else it helps the list. :-)
> 
:-) Yes, that's the idea.

> PS: Are you still revamping the llvm exception API as you proposed a couple of months ago, or was this effort
> ditched? 
> 
I still want to do this, but it hasn't been fully vetted or approved yet.

-bw