[LLVMdev] Changes in FunctionPassManager constructor

[David Vandevoorde]

On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:

> On 3 févr. 2010, at 17:54, Eli Friedman wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christophe de Dinechin
>> <christophe at taodyne.com> wrote:
>>> What guarantees does LLVM try to provide regarding source code compatibility?
>> 
>> None.
> 
> And this is a good thing because... ?


It avoids having to deal with backward compatibility cruft?

It's a pain for client code, but I suspect that for the long-term quality of the code base it's a useful decision.

	Daveed