[LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows

[Jim Grosbach]

Did you specify "--program-prefix=llvm-" on your configure line? That's what tells the llvm-gcc build to use the llvm-* names for the executables.

-Jim

On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:27 PM, akramul azim wrote:

> Thanks a lot both of you. Using --enable-bindings=none, I could build and install LLVM 2.8 and gcc-4.2-2.8 source. However, in the bin directory, I get c++.exe, cpp.exe, gcc.exe, g++.exe instead of llvm-c++.exe, llvm-cpp.exe, llvm-gcc.exe, llvm-g++. Are they the same? 
> Akramul
> 
> --- On Tue, 21/12/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> 
> From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows
> To: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es>
> Cc: "akramul azim" <bijoy123_8 at yahoo.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Date: Tuesday, 21 December, 2010, 6:41 PM
> 
> > Possibly the OCaml bindings are broken on Windows/MinGW. Try building
> > with cmake instead of configure&make. The cmake build ignores the OCaml
> > bindings.
> One does not need to use cmake build to disable buildings :) It is
> possible to configure with
> --enable-bindings=none.
> 
> Also, I'd suggest to use at least LLVM release 2.8, not 2.7 one.
> 
> 
> -- 
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev