On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, thanks for your response. > AFAIK, Removing -g from the second call to gcc does not seem to do anything. > The generated executable shows the same behavior under gdb. Does adding -O0 to the llc command-line help? (I didn't spot that before.) -Eli