[LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes

Arjun arjunsingri at gmail.com
Thu Apr 22 23:50:33 PDT 2010

Previous message: [LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes
Next message: [LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Personally, I would make everything a FunctionPass.  

What if a FunctionPass requires the results of a LoopPass? Is there a way to get
all loops of a function without using LoopPass and LoopInfo?

Previous message: [LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes
Next message: [LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list