[LLVMdev] Code Size Benchmark

Liu Jian gjk.liu at gmail.com
Mon Apr 19 05:52:16 PDT 2010

HMM, GCC is always the best.
email to: gjk.liu at gmail.com

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> We did some benchmarks on code size with clang, gcc 4.5, and open64. Clang
> performed second in the test. The benchmark is CSiBE. Clang can't compile
> the linux kernel (some inline asm not supported) and replaypc (error: use of
> unknown builtin '__builtin_next_arg'). The concrete results are attached.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100419/14b324e3/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list