[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 8, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Devang Patel wrote:

>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>>> This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html
>>>
>>> Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a  
>>> bit and its not causing a regression.
>>
>> No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6.  Devang, can you  
>> please prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the  
>> 2.6 branch?
>>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html
>
> hmmm... r81058 fixes a bug in the code that I added as part of  
> r79742. We definitely do not want to add r79742 in 2.6. Are we sure  
> that 4879 is not a recent regression ?

Ok, if 2.6 is not affected, then we definitely don't want to mess with  
it.  Thanks.

-Chris