[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables

Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 22:30:06 PDT 2009

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max
Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first
> place?

If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark
it or calls to it noreturn.  If in fact cannot return, the concept of
control flow after the function returns fundamentally makes no sense.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list