[LLVMdev] should we stop using llvm-as/llvm-dis in tests?

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Sat Sep 5 19:24:10 PDT 2009

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
> Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> writes:
>> ... and it is definitely worth doing. On my system a 'time' of make
>> check reports that about 50% of the real time running make check is
>> spent in the OS. This probably also limits the efficacy of attempts to
>> parallelize the test suite, if someone was crazy enough to do that.
> Why would be crazy to run the test suite on parallel? Because DejaGNU
> limitations?

It was a joke, I'm actively working on this. Stay tuned. :)

 - Daniel

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list