[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing

[Tanya Lattner]

No. Only things defined as regressions according to this may go in:
http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify

-Tanya


On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> Is there are chance to get http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5081  
> fixed in
> 2.6? The affected application did compile with with LLVM 2.5. I  
> haven't yet
> checked whether TOT fixed this already, however, but will do this if  
> necessary.
>
> Thanks,
> Torvald
>
> On Saturday 17 October 2009 20:51:05 Tanya Lattner wrote:
>> LLVMers,
>>
>> 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
>>
>> If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the  
>> release.
>>
>> To test llvm-gcc:
>>
>> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
>> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
>> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
>> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass).  
>> Note
>> that you need to reconfigure llvm with llvm-gcc in your path or  
>> with --
>> with-llvmgccdir
>> 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt
>>
>>
>> To test clang:
>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
>> 2) Run make check for llvm.
>> 3) Run make  -C tools/clang-2.6 test VERBOSE=1 (report any failures  
>> or
>> unexpected passes)
>>
>> When reporting your results, please provide details on what platform
>> you compiled on, and how
>> you built LLVM (src == obj, or src != obj), clang, and/or llvm-gcc.
>>
>> Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY 5pm PDT on October 21st!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tanya Lattner
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev