[LLVMdev] Target data question
Kenneth Uildriks
kennethuil at gmail.com
Tue Oct 20 18:29:14 PDT 2009
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
>>> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
>>> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
>>> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So in the near future, the optimizers won't do any target-specific
>> transformations in the absence of module target data?
>
> As near as when someone steps up to do the work :-). I'm not
> actively working on this myself right now.
>
> Dan
>
>
I uncovered a few cases where optimizers still crash when the target
data pass isn't registered, and I'll send patches as I can.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list