[LLVMdev] JVM Backend

[David Roberts]

>> Additional patch attached, is this suitable?
> Looks good, thanks. What's about arithmetics?
Revised patch attached.

--
David Roberts
http://da.vidr.cc/



On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 17:08, Anton Korobeynikov
<anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> Hello, David
>
>> Additional patch attached, is this suitable?
> Looks good, thanks. What's about arithmetics?
>
>>> The current big question is: how you're planning to deal with
>>> arbitrary precision stuff which might come from LLVM IR.
>> I should be able to implement that. Would arbitrary precision support
>> be required for the initial commit of the backend?
> I really don't think so. But you should aware, that you can easy
> obtain, say, i33 from C bitfields-heavy code, or i256 due to LLVM
> optimizers.
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-jvm-test.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 1003 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091126/0978b976/attachment.bin>