[LLVMdev] PR5373

[Dan Gohman]

Hello,

I haven't studied this in detail, but at a first look this makes the  
code inconsistent with the associated comments. Why should the code  
continue recursing past a loop exit?

Dan

On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Jakub Staszak <kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This patch fixes pr5373, testcase of course attached.
>
> -Jakub
> <5373.patch>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev