[LLVMdev] values with no name in 2.6

[Owen Anderson]

On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Jay Foad wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've been upgrading some custom LLVM passes to work with LLVM 2.6
> instead of LLVM 2.5. I've noticed that in 2.6, some functions seem to
> have several local values with no name (where getName() returns an
> empty string). I never saw this in 2.5. Is this a known change in
> behaviour? Is there some handy way to get unique, deterministic names
> assigned to all values in a function?

Run the -instnamer pass.

--Owen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2620 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091113/98058f99/attachment.bin>