[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type

David Greene dag at cray.com
Fri Nov 13 06:46:58 PST 2009


On Thursday 12 November 2009 22:48, Chris Lattner wrote:

> > There is also the question of whether intptrs should be allowed as
> > *members* of vectors. I have no opinion on this, except to say that
> > it probably only makes sense in situations where you can also have
> > vectors of pointers.
>
> Vectors of pointers are not allowed.  I think disallowing intptr in
> vectors makes perfect sense.

Then we're going to need to fix this in the IR fairly soon.  We won't be
able to support architectures like Larrabee nicely until we do.

                            -Dave



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list